A Question of Guns in a land of Murder

San Bernardino California.  Fourteen killed.  Assault rifles.  Two dead suspects.  Public pain. Private mourning.  Youth and wisdom gone Forever. 

Appeals for stiffer gun laws countered by "people kill people", guns are only ancillary.  The President appearing before us numb and dejected.  Nobody knows what to do or how to stop the kind of violence that erupts suddenly and without mercy.

In sum, our collective response has become "speechlessness".  We are not one iota closer to resolution than we were hundreds of years ago when terror struck.  And terror has been around since humans have been around.

Instead, we spend endless hours debating whether San Bernardino was an "act of terrorism" or not?  What the shooters motives really were?  But they are dead.  And terror struck--need it have another name?

In today's world there is no safe haven.  Armed militia roam our streets and schools. They lend an aura of safety, but do they keep us safe?

So then, you say, what should we do?  If we cannot stop the violence, should we prepare to die on an undisclosed day at an unknown location?  Should we get our affairs in order?  Live our lives to the fullest? Give ourselves over to the unstoppable?  Or should we pray for new weapons of defense, better technology, and smarter leaders?

I say no to all of the above.  For the above is what we have always done.  And nothing has changed.  In fact, one might argue, it has only gotten worse.

Sow trust, compassion, forgiveness, a smile, and a helping hand wherever you are and as often as you can. These actions do not involve money, power, guns, fear, doubt or revenge. They are positive tokens one gives freely to another.  Tokens that can then be passed on even if the giver is unaware that they have done so.

Such acts are already occurring throughout our globe, but infrequently do we hear or read of them.  We sorely need more stories in the media about the Good News.  Positive actions that brings warmth and light back into our damaged world.

People who kill people through acts of terror have lost their way.  Every ethnicity and religion has fallen victim to their acts.  Anger, hate and fear are deadly weapons.  Our job is to replace them with their opposites.  Not for one day or one year, but as a way of life going forward every moment of every day!

Pharmaceutical Companies and Pricing of Drugs, Among Other Things

Recently, my doctor gave me a couple of samples of time-release Naprosin with an added ingredient to offset stomach upset.  Naprosin has been around for years and is used to treat pain from arthritis and similar conditions.  The drug my doctor prescribed is called Vumovo.

You may recall last week that the media was abuzz with the outrageous pricing of a drug called Daraprim. Its bold, new owner had raised the price from $13 to over $700 dollars a pill.  One of the articles regarding this story included a list of other drugs with a similar histories (but no outright media frenzy).

Yes, you guessed it.  At the bottom of the list was Vumovo.  This drug once retailed for $200/60 pills, until the pharmaceutical company decided to raise it to $1683/60 pills.  Had I not seen the article, I would have asked my doctor to order a prescription.  Of course I would have refused to pay for it at the counter and the pharmacy would be left to restock it.

When I mentioned this situation to a friend, she asked:  "Isn't it illegal?  And I said, no!"  Diabetes, pain meds, tuberculosis, cancer, and antipsychoic meds are but a few of the drugs/treatments that companies overprice.

At its new price, Daraprim would cost about $252,000 a year for 360 pills.  Vumovo, $10,098 for 360 pills. I know of at least one instance when a single Chemo treatment cost $100,000.  Pharmaceutical companies do these things because they can--get away with it.

I have since asked my physician for an alternative to Vumovo and she has provided it, being none-to-pleased with the drug company herself.  I now take two pills instead of one.  A ninety-day supply of both drugs is $20/180 pills.  Over a year that's $80.

What troubles me most is that this travesty of humanity is but one instance of the insanity of greed, and that we, the consumer, often feel no recourse to complain.  Not everyone can switch to another drug.  Not everyone can say "I just won't take it."  For many, the drug is an absolute necessity.  Diabetics, people with cancer, mental illness, and drug resistant TB for instance.

Over the years we humans have lost control of our very lives.  Lost control because we didn't see it happening until it was too late.

Government takes our hard earned money and spends it willy-nilly.  If we refuse to pay taxes in protest, the IRS comes after us.  It's not a pretty scene.  They don't let up and they have a LOT of power to say--freeze your assets or empty your bank account.

Those who attend big sports events are very familiar with "event parking".  Here, price gouging is raised to an art form.  Want to go to the game?  Pay the going rate. The defenders call it the result of "limited" parking. That's nonsense. The same amount of spaces exist event or no event.  It's just a way to make a bundle of money at the expense of the sports fan who needs a place to put his/her car.

Movie theaters have for eons overcharged on snacks and drinks.  We pay.  Our blood pressure may rise twenty points, but we pay.

Recently it cost a relative of mine $30 to have a taillight changed.

A few weeks ago the labor to cut and lay tile down and remove the old tile was quoted at $4,000.  This in a 1500 sq ft house, the area being tiled about 150 sq feet.

And last, but not least, I have gluten intolerance.  A couple of months ago I went out to breakfast and ordered gluten free toast.  When the bill came, the toast was $6/2 slices.

A loaf of gluten free bread is about $6.  It has about 14 slices of bread.  Three dollars times 14 slices equals $42.  Instead of a tip, I left a note protesting the cost.  Here the server got penalized.

I don't always stand up for my rights, but of late I've done more standing and less sitting on my hands.

The world in which we live (a common theme with me) is created by us, you and me.  While we have been hoodwinked by corporations and government, that doesn't mean we have to take it.

In a capitalist society the pocketbook talks.  Speak up, not by shouting or throwing things, or loosing your temper.  Speak boldly, succinctly and proudly, but speak, as much as you can and as often as you can.  Go to places that are fair to their customers and their employees.  Buy products that are fairly priced.  Ask for alternatives to price-gouging drugs whenever possible.  Just because your insurance may pick up the tab doesn't make it right.  Someone else will pay for it down the line.  Eventually your insurance rates will rise.

The cost of living is over the heads of millions.  The great Titanic sank because one too many watertight compartments split open.  America is the richest country in the world  China is next.  The latter is struggling to hold its economy together, but there may not be enough lifeboats, as with the Titanic.  The former is about 18 trillion of dollars in debt and about to raise its debt limit.   Who will pay it back?  Your grandchildren!

There are more part-time and poorly paid jobs in America than ever before and, overall, there are fewer jobs.  Job security it non-existent, even in government.  More than one state teeters on bankruptcy.

We are one watertight compartment from sinking.  If you don't believe me, look at congress and its inability to get anything done.

You and me, folks!  You and me.

JUST BECAUSE WE CAN ...

Over the past couple of months I have heard comments regarding the future of certain technologies that will deeply impact the world in which we live.  The first are Robots, which can, and already are, replacing or assisting humans in a wide variety of tasks.  The second are driverless cars. Which are in the test mode as we speak.  Thirdly, the ability to clone a sheep is but one step away from cloning Us. Choosing the "perfect" human being without its attendant foibles and predispositions toward lethal or debilitating maladies.

The human mind is infinite in its ability to think up and then figure out how to put each thought into motion.  If it makes a lot of money, all the more reason to move on to development and sale.  Right?

This Blog is about human genius pitted against what is best for humanity today and generations to come.

JUST BECAUSE WE CAN...should we?  JUST BECAUSE WE CAN...must we?

The Robot, it has been predicted, will eventually do the menial jobs.  The lifting and toting, the repetitive jobs, the "labor" jobs.  Millions of Americans make a living at these jobs right now, but in the future, say the "futurists", these same individuals will have to reinvent themselves.  Maybe become  entrepreneurs who "invent two or three jobs" to put bread on the table.  "Entrepreneurs" because there will not be enough jobs to go around.

Driverless cars can enable the blind and disabled to "drive" from point A to point B.  They can deliver packages and food and every other manner of goods to far flung areas.  Thus eliminating the need for long-distance truck drivers.  Of course these driverless semis will be met by Robots at the other end, thus solving the problem of who will unload the freight.

As for cloning, wouldn't the world be better if we could genetically manage it's progeny.  Do away with disease, evil acts, and the undesirable?

I'd  like to think that our first considerations when inventing and then selling a new idea or product would be:  How will they impact my children and my childrens' children?  Will they make life better, safer, happier, more secure?  Will elimination of jobs create more poverty, more dis-ease, more war?  Will driverless cars further overburden our roads and highways, which are falling apart daily from overuse.

Will we ever be able to clone the perfect human?  What is the perfect human anyway?  And who gets to decide?  The cloners?  Do you we really want to live in a Stepford world?

Yes, Robots  might be useful in performing tasks humans no longer want to do, but shouldn't those same humans be the ones to decide, not the one who invents the possibility?

As for driverless cars.  Wouldn't it be better to devise ways to move people from A to B to C in mass transportation instead, and reduce cars and their attendant pollution?

The bottom line is, JUST BECAUSE WE CAN, does not mean it is wise or  humane; it just means we can.  Humans created the Bomb because they couldn't resist doing so.  Then we dropped it on Nagasaki and Hiroshima.  Thousands of innocents died ignominious deaths.  We haven't dropped a bomb since.  We dropped it because we could.  Now we have 16,000 nuclear weapons worldwide--just because we can.

Today's children are growing up in a world that is moving at warp speed.  Immediate gratification is a near reality with I-Phones and the Internet.  Games are played on handheld devices instead of in the backyard.  XBox has replaced outdoor basketball and baseball.

Technology is here to stay.  It arrived with the printing press and has accelerated humankind's ability to do and know beyond any cave dwellers wildest imagination.  In turn, no one can deny that technology has its place, but every invention, no matter how unique, must be approached with caution.

JUST BECAUSE WE CAN does not mean we will, or, more importantly, that we should!

SUFFERING

Why do we suffer?  

Why do we inflict suffering upon others?  

Can we change this pattern in our world?

I believe we can.  

If we lived in a world that abhorred suffering in all its forms, suffering would no longer exist.

I speak of all manner of suffering: that which is self-inflicted, that which occurs because of accident or random violence, that which is purposely imposed by courts and tribunals, that which catches us unawares, such as illness.

We live in a world that is not only filled with suffering, but also constructed about a system that guarantees its perpetuation.

We have 16,000 nuclear weapons stockpiled in world arsenals.  We believe in the maxim "an eye for an eye", and mete out so-called justice accordingly.  We wish to impose the greatest punishment upon those who inflict the most grievous pain.  We strive mightily to design a retribution that is equal to the act inflicted upon us.  We call this Justice; the law agrees.

In our anger and pain, we cannot see the lasting implications of all our hatred and vengeance. We choose not to see that it has changed nothing in our world.  It has not made it safer, more humane, or more loving.  It has, instead, created an "armed camp" waiting for the next terrorist to strike us down on some unknown day, in some unknown place, at some unknown time.

We believe in guns and armaments, the more sophisticated the better, until all our battles are fought by drones and robots.  The innocent will still die, while the "soldiers" will simply fall apart or into disrepair.

What have I done today to make a better world?  A less painful world.  What is behind my anger and my pain?  

The core of the world's pain is rarely examined.  James Holmes committed a heinous act. Innocent people died and were maimed.  James Holmes suffered from a brain disease that influenced his actions.  One juror held out for life in prison instead of the death penalty.

Our mental health system is in shreds.  It is poorly funded and lacking in trained professionals. Burnout is high.  There is rarely any intermediate recovery care for those released from acute care.  They either go home (if they have one), to the streets, or, too often, to jail.  This is one of the single most distressing issues facing mentally diseased individuals.  The majority of such individuals do not kill; we must be clear about this.  But some few do.

Beyond the failing system, is the stigma of mental disease, which often keeps families and victims from first, admitting it exists, and secondly, taking action to get help.

The U.S. is awash with guns.  The more the President and various individuals try to reign them in, the more they proliferate.  

We must get rid of our guns.  Now!  Of course this is drastic, but it is absolutely necessary.  We must get rid of our bombs as well.  All of them!  Nuclear proliferation treaties are like putting a raincoat on the ocean.  It is too big, too powerful and too unpredictable.

We must replace judgment with trust.  Now!  Once you judge a person, you eliminate the chance to ever truly know them.  

Suffering exists because we feed it daily on an international scale and locally on a personal level.  We often do so unknowingly by a snide remark or gesture.  Every action, be it internal or external, ripples across the globe like the flutter of a butterfly's wings.  Throw a handful of dirt into the wind and it will blow back at you.

Tomorrow is too late!  

BELIEFS

It is perhaps time in our human history to  pause and take a serious look at "beliefs"...in some circles, the term is capitalized simply by the weight and power afforded to it by its holders.

Some beliefs are standard practice.  Do not harm a child.  Do not kill the innocent.  Do not steal another's possessions.  Do not cheat.  Do not lie.  

Some beliefs are subjective, i.e., personal views of the world--beliefs that are often contrary to that of a neighbor, colleague, or family member.

In America, there are many different beliefs.  Even individuals with similar beliefs might express them in different ways.

The reason I am writing about "beliefs" is because the world we live in is ruled by them.  One of the most profound of all being religious Beliefs--the capital word is most suitable here.

The question I pose to you the reader, is why are religious beliefs given more weight than most any other belief?  Why do they garner so much power?  Why are we ruled by them, cursed by them, and too oft, destroyed by them?

When personal belief's become societal beliefs (not that all of society abides these beliefs), do they become more true?  Are they not still subjective beliefs held by a great number of people?  And as such, should they be given any more than respect?

A prior Blog looked at beliefs in respect to gay rights and suggested that one is entitled to believe anything he or she chooses, but draws a line at imposing (and having the law concur) them on others not so inclined.

This blog is here as food for thought.  In a pluralistic society, the unfettered power of one is contrary to democracy.  Religion is a belief system.  And I propose it is no more nor less than any other.

Capitalism

What is Capitalism?

To a poor man or woman, it is the unattainable.

To Karl Marx, it was greed.

To the wealthy, it is the reward for hard work and unfettered risk taking.

To politicians, it is the answer to all society's ills--albeit through very different lenses.

In truth, Capitalism is none of the above.  It is, first and foremost, an unruly system thrust into the hands of human beings without instructions or guideposts.  It is, to paraphrase Adam Smith, an "every man/woman for him/herself" kind of system.  And because it is a System, it has no feelings, no desires, no disappointments and no worries.

In most every other human interaction systems are governed by human being.  Not so with Capitalism.   Capitalism is the ruling Monarchy, the disguised dictatorship, the golden goose, the brass ring, the winner takes all, the no holds barred.

You get the picture.

When a pro athlete signs a 145 million dollar, three year contract and a pro golfer takes home nearly 2 million dollars for five days of sport, while 20 percent of Oregon's children live in poverty, one must ask, what is money, really?

When an employer says "this is all I can offer you," and yet that employer takes in millions, perhaps, billions of dollars a year over and above its expenses, a wide-awake human being should be appalled.

Yet, everyday people take poverty level, minimum wage jobs--which seem to be growing by leaps and bounds--the very same people who keep our corporations going from the ground floor up, and without whom these same corporations would have to close their doors.

I believe the day is coming when major world economies will crumble into giant heaps, buried under vast debt and speculation, immense greed and unrealistic ideals.

No one is worth 145 million dollars when over 1 billion of our world's children still live in poverty. One person living in poverty one single second longer is one second too many!  Charity cannot not sustain them.  Soup kitchens and food pantries do not give them lasting security.  They provide a meal for a day with no promise that another will be forthcoming tomorrow or the day after.  In turn, no one with a job today is guaranteed it will be there tomorrow.  And if you can't afford the necessities, you must chosse debt or go without.

How can we so idolize such a system?  Why are our greatest minds not focused on a new, more realistic one?  One that sees money as merely a tool to providing life's needs in equal measure to all.

A world built on debt and speculation, on mega corporations and the race to become billionaires so that we can possess more of the same and dispose of it with abandon, cannot stand forever.  An equilateral triangle will hold its point erect in perpetuity.  But in economics, that same triangle, with the wealthiest at the top and the poorest at the bottom, will eventually wither away at its roots until even this indestructible system must decay from lack of care.

The Naysayers regarding the Right to Marry

Yesterday was a joyous one for the gay community (June 26, 2015), but it was a troubling day for humanity as a whole.  

We come into this world a bundle of unknowns; the labels  "heterosexual" and "homosexual” are added sometime around puberty.  We don't go to Wal Mart and buy them for ourselves; they are "bestowed" upon us by a supposedly "all-wise" society, many of whom believe that such divisions really matter.

Yesterday, five members of the U S Supreme Court said that all people are equal, and entitled unequivocally to the privileges provided under our form of government.  

Marriage began as a consensual ritual formed centuries ago to set certain couples apart from others.  Over time it has gathered an abundance of legal and personal privileges.  Marriage has, and continues, to symbolize commitment between two individuals who love each other and who want to spend their lives together.  Just because marriage has traditionally been between men and woman, does not mean that it cannot include same sex couples.  

Marriage was “closed” by the courts and the Congress only recently, but  historical habit must not prohibit change and adaptation.

As regards the Bible--Jesus welcomed all to his table, without caveat, and yet most of the bias against gay marriage is religiously based.

A "belief system" is just that, something one believes.  Beliefs are not set in stone; they evolve and change over time.  Once there was a place the Roman Catholic Church called Limbo, an amorphous realm situated between Heaven and Hell where residents waited to be called to one side or the other.  Now, it does not exist at all.

I am a person first.  Do not label me.  Do not tell me I am less (or more) than you.  Do not assume that just because you do not like me or my lifestyle that you have the right to deny me the same choices you enjoy every day.

What is equality?  What is justice?  What does the phase "liberty and justice for all," mean?

Our country was founded on the above ideals.  Our founding fathers were centered on a vision of a better world.  They had no idea how that vision would play out over the centuries. They set up their ideals boldly, but those ideals had one shortsighted pitfall....they began with what those same men could comfortably negotiate.  Only landowning men could vote.  Slavery remained in place.  Though the dream of equality burned brightly, they were ill-prepared to afford it to all.

The U S Supreme Court justices who voted in favor of marriage for all understand that "government of the people" is a fine, noble ideal, but they also realize that no government can neglect minority rights while it waits for the majority to change their hearts and minds.

Equality has been "urged along" throughout our history; it has been urged along because people suffer when it is not.  This momentum has been acted out through legal statute often accompanied by public protest, and sadly, violence: The Emancipation Proclamation, the Black vote, the Women's vote, biracial marriage, and now, gay marriage.  

Equality cannot be parceled out when one is happy, amenable, or religiously or emotionally ready.  Equality is the foundation of America.  It is supposedly why our soldiers go to other countries to fight and die.  We hold America high and say, "be like us.  Free!!! 

By our actions will they know us, not by our words.

ou