APPLE'S $10,000 WATCH!!!
Apple has just released its top-of-the-line watch. Its target: the luxury market. Those who can afford to wear a high-priced gadget.
No mention is made of the six billion nine hundred ninety-nine million people on the planet who cannot afford it. No mention is made of how such a watch will make a better world, end rampant poverty, or bring world peace.
I can think of many things this world needs more than another expensive gadget to show off to one's friends. The Rolex is not enough?!
Companies that create and market such items have lost my business. Period.
Instead of this, why not:
--End poverty,
--Cure debilitating and life-ending diseases,
--Mend our dysfunctional mental health system,
--Rethink and restructure our educational system,
--Disassemble our current U. S. Congress and reassemble it with people who actually understand diversity of opinion and the need for communication and compromise,
--Create products that will last,
--Provide equal and excellent healthcare to all,
--Pay a living wage to ALL,
--Create a People and Environmentally conscious world in lieu of a Money-driven world.
The world is filled with genius. Apple is a fine example of a company that just keeps coming up with novel ideas and processes. The only problem is, the goal seems to be: stay one step of the competition. Keep the stockholders and Wall Street happy.
This particular road is the road to Nowhere. All giants fall eventually.
What if the world's focus was on collaboration with one's peers instead of competition? What if the end product was the creation of a wholesome and peaceful world? What if money was ancillary and a healthy world primary?
What if, Apple? What if?
This Blog is about what comes next for our world. What will we choose? How will we decide? And once we've decided, how will we make our vision a reality?
© 2010
The Journey ahead is about all of us.
Friday, March 13, 2015
Thursday, February 12, 2015
February 13, 2015
The Vatican out of touch with the world?
First of all, I must applaud Ireland and Germany and the members of the committee looking into child abuse allegations against the clergy for coming out against physical punishment of children. Germany has even gone so far as to outlaw it.
I was raised in an era when spanking a child with a belt or a switch (from a tree) was acceptable. As a young parent, I spanked my children, though I did not use a switch or a belt. Then one day I woke up and realized that it was wrong. Terribly, terribly wrong!
Adults are many times bigger and stronger than their children. They often act in anger and frustration. They inflict pain and emotional hurt, especially as the child grows older and becomes more aware of what is happening.
It is never okay to hit a defenseless person, be it a child or an adult. It is never okay to inflict emotional pain on another child or adult. It is never okay because each human deserves respect and dignity, no matter the age.
As for being selfish for choosing not to have children. The Vatican has stepped into the inviolable realm of the intimate and personal. Such decisions should be decided by the two consenting adults concerned. If they desire Papal advice, then it is something they have chosen and not something that has been imposed upon them.
Parenting is a lifelong commitment that is best undertaken when each party is mature and fully aware of the choices they are making. The world is now 7+ billion people strong and growing daily. Those who want to have children should do so; and those who do not, should not. How religion ever got into these issues is a puzzle. Jesus was all about injustice, intolerance, greed and stale religious ritual. He did love children, but I know of nowhere in the New Testament where he advocated procreation as a Godly pursuit. In fact, scholars still argue over own his marital status or lack thereof.
I applaud Pope Francis for his efforts to raise awareness of the poor and disenfranchised. I applaud his efforts to encourage dialogue among warring nations. But I am completely befuddled by a man who uses the "other hand", so to speak, to validate corporal punishment for children and "punching" someone who "insults his mother."
It is possible that the Pope's advocacy of the "punch" following the Charlie Hebdo attack was metaphorical and in support of his belief that we must respect each other or incur the wrath of the injured party. But it sent a message nonetheless:
When faced with an insult, retaliate in a manner that shows your anger. In which vain follows, when faced with a recalcitrant child, whip him into submission.
What more can I say?
The Vatican out of touch with the world?
Once more I am drawn to Pope Francis’
recent comments on how to react when insulted, on the spanking of children and on the "selfishness"
of those who choose not to have children.
I was raised in an era when spanking a child with a belt or a switch (from a tree) was acceptable. As a young parent, I spanked my children, though I did not use a switch or a belt. Then one day I woke up and realized that it was wrong. Terribly, terribly wrong!
Adults are many times bigger and stronger than their children. They often act in anger and frustration. They inflict pain and emotional hurt, especially as the child grows older and becomes more aware of what is happening.
It is never okay to hit a defenseless person, be it a child or an adult. It is never okay to inflict emotional pain on another child or adult. It is never okay because each human deserves respect and dignity, no matter the age.
As for being selfish for choosing not to have children. The Vatican has stepped into the inviolable realm of the intimate and personal. Such decisions should be decided by the two consenting adults concerned. If they desire Papal advice, then it is something they have chosen and not something that has been imposed upon them.
Parenting is a lifelong commitment that is best undertaken when each party is mature and fully aware of the choices they are making. The world is now 7+ billion people strong and growing daily. Those who want to have children should do so; and those who do not, should not. How religion ever got into these issues is a puzzle. Jesus was all about injustice, intolerance, greed and stale religious ritual. He did love children, but I know of nowhere in the New Testament where he advocated procreation as a Godly pursuit. In fact, scholars still argue over own his marital status or lack thereof.
I applaud Pope Francis for his efforts to raise awareness of the poor and disenfranchised. I applaud his efforts to encourage dialogue among warring nations. But I am completely befuddled by a man who uses the "other hand", so to speak, to validate corporal punishment for children and "punching" someone who "insults his mother."
We cannot have it both ways.
"Do no harm" is a fine maxim. These three pithy words are
tucked into every religious creed. But
in practice, religions often punctuate its meaning with a “but” . . .
but when a child is misbehaving, but when we deem it otherwise, but when one is
insulted.
It is possible that the Pope's advocacy of the "punch" following the Charlie Hebdo attack was metaphorical and in support of his belief that we must respect each other or incur the wrath of the injured party. But it sent a message nonetheless:
When faced with an insult, retaliate in a manner that shows your anger. In which vain follows, when faced with a recalcitrant child, whip him into submission.
What more can I say?
Monday, January 19, 2015
STATE OF THE UNION - 2015
The state of our Union on this cold
January day, 2015, is Divided.
"A house divided against itself
cannot stand," said Abraham Lincoln 150 years ago.
If one looks at our nation over time, it
has always been divided: By the haves and the have nots, by the right and the
left, by the hawks and the doves.
We call these divisions Democracy and praise America's undying (or
dying) commitment to it.
President Obama will give his State of the
Union address on January 20th. One topic that is receiving a lot of attention
of late is his desire to increase taxes on the wealthy to afford more spending
power to the rest of the country. While noble in theory, a starving man cannot move beyond his economic status on
"crumbs" alone, which is what such well-meaning actions provide. Soon
the "crumbs" are devoured by rising costs and the cry to buy, buy,
buy! Consume, consume, consume!
Our economy cannot survive without these actions, and the vicious cycle continues with no relief!
The only way for those with less to rise from
the middle, or from the bottom, is for our country to change the way money is valued.
No one should receive a $20 million dollar salary when far too many workers make
less than $15/hr. In our world today, money really means nothing.
It means nothing because it does not do what it should do,
provide every human being with quality of life. Economists who see only
numbers, will argue that you cannot define "quality of life" for
every person, therefore it cannot be achieved.
In our gut, we all know what a quality life
is. Nourishing food choices, decent housing, excellent healthcare and education,
enjoyable employment, and leisure. Never having to worry about our next meal, a
roof over our heads, or health services when in need.
In our world, the economic pyramid is
inverted. The point is being shoved into the earth by the weight of the
accumulation of wealth at the top. Money in the hands of a few trickles
down only in proportion to the amount needed to keep the wealthy, wealthy. And yet, all employees are invested in
the commerce of our world. All make the "world turn" so to
speak. They deserve their fair share!
Don't give us crumbs. Restructure
salaries so that everyone gets paid to live a quality life. And those who
cannot provide for themselves? Yes, they get the same.
In America millions are left out of our
wealth. So they act out. We need visionary leaders. We need true "people
persons” who will create a world where people come first.
Money has become a means to an end. And it is slowly killing our spirit.
We have a divided Congress.
This is not Democracy. It is a
nation divided against it self.
Sunday, January 11, 2015
THE FREE WORLD GATHERS IN PARIS - JAN 11, 2015
Today the free world gathers in Paris.
They gather in solidarity against those who use guns to silence freedom.
In numbers, the terrorists are few.
But they are angry and they are single-mindedly set upon a course that
destroys lives and communities. They thrive on fear as their reward.
As with any story, there are two sides.
There is the defiance of protests and marches such as these. There
are the words of condolence and outrage.
The other side of the story is less easy
to speak of. It is the great question of mankind from the beginning of
time. The biblical Cain and Able. The killing of one brother by
another because of jealousy. The Bible is symbolic of course, but its
message is real. We humans have been killing each other forever.
FOREVER!
Terrorism will not disappear today because
of Paris. I doubt future terrorists will be moved by our outward act of
defiance in the face of the great uncertainty that terrorism engenders--its
unpredictability.
So how do we stop it? Can we stop
it? Yes!
One day at a time. One kindness at a
time. Tolerance of all peoples. Efforts to dig deep until we
unearth the real reasons for radical acts. Listening intently to what
they say, for at the core of their oft cancerous rhetoric is a message.
Do we as a civilization bear any
responsibility for the terrifying world we live in? Did not America invade Iraq without due cause? Did not thousands of innocents die as a
result? Do we not systematically kill radical leaders without due process
of law? Have we not worked with Middle Eastern leaders when it was advantageous
and then summarily deposed them when it was not? What of Guantanamo and
its many inhumane and unresolved issues?
To heal we must admit our own part in the
cruelty of our world. The innocents who died in Afghanistan and Iraq also
have a say. Those easily lead or deeply frustrated say it with mayhem.
This story is not about the bad versus the
good. It is the story of a world that twists its meaning to fit the
moment. It is easier to name a wrong when it is brutal and in your face--as in
France this week. It is harder when it is couched in political terms as a
justifiable response to murderous acts.
We must stop retaliating for retaliation's
sake. The march in Paris today is an act of defiance against terrorism.
It is peaceful. The majority of our world wants peace. Quiet. Security. Kindness.
Let is act in self-defense, of course.
But beyond that, we must stop the killing. Until we do, until we
see the story in Paris as Our story, the story of civilization, little will
change and soon we will live in armed camps, with fear in our hearts, until
someone somewhere commits the final act and kills us all.
Friday, January 9, 2015
PARIS MASSACRE - DAY TWO
A Moslem police officer was the final victim of the Paris massacre on January 7th. He died defending freedom. For me his death says that people kill people. Not nations, not religions.
Two brothers killed 12 people. It does not matter what their belief, who they followed, why they did what they did. What matters is that somewhere along the course of their young lives, these two individuals decided on a path of destruction.
The reasons for terrorism are many. Too many to name or even explain. Terrorism has been a part of our world for as long as people have found fault with their neighbor. It is difficult to predict and it is always destructive.
Terrorism is the greatest ulcer on the soul of our world. It has grown beyond all imagination into a worldwide poison that has "infected" those most vulnerable.
With all our bombs and rhetoric we have not been able to lance it. It continues to grow. Like a deadly cancer, we have found no cure.
We have faced it down in solidarity: "Le suis Charlie" and "Le suis Ahmed". We have bombed it. Run it to ground. Railed at it from very government in the world with a conscience. We have written about it, satirized it. Mourned its terror and destruction. But what has changed?
We need to look beyond past responses. We must begin anew. Can we really kill terrorism? And if we kill "it", will not others rise up in its stead?
We must offer those who would do these things an alternate message. A message that will lance the "ulcer" so that it can drain and heal.
Vengeance does not work. You can kill terrorists, but can you really kill the thoughts and beliefs that inspire them? We perhaps need new thoughts and new beliefs, beginning with teaching our young people to think for themselves. To question everything. To follow no one without checking their gut first. We need to exemplify kindness, charity, forgiveness, compassion, acceptance of all and the exclusion of none.
Ninety-nine point nine percent of us do not take up weapons and kill. Why? Let's tap into that. Let's mass produce that.
A Moslem police officer was the final victim of the Paris massacre on January 7th. He died defending freedom. For me his death says that people kill people. Not nations, not religions.
Two brothers killed 12 people. It does not matter what their belief, who they followed, why they did what they did. What matters is that somewhere along the course of their young lives, these two individuals decided on a path of destruction.
The reasons for terrorism are many. Too many to name or even explain. Terrorism has been a part of our world for as long as people have found fault with their neighbor. It is difficult to predict and it is always destructive.
Terrorism is the greatest ulcer on the soul of our world. It has grown beyond all imagination into a worldwide poison that has "infected" those most vulnerable.
With all our bombs and rhetoric we have not been able to lance it. It continues to grow. Like a deadly cancer, we have found no cure.
We have faced it down in solidarity: "Le suis Charlie" and "Le suis Ahmed". We have bombed it. Run it to ground. Railed at it from very government in the world with a conscience. We have written about it, satirized it. Mourned its terror and destruction. But what has changed?
We need to look beyond past responses. We must begin anew. Can we really kill terrorism? And if we kill "it", will not others rise up in its stead?
We must offer those who would do these things an alternate message. A message that will lance the "ulcer" so that it can drain and heal.
Vengeance does not work. You can kill terrorists, but can you really kill the thoughts and beliefs that inspire them? We perhaps need new thoughts and new beliefs, beginning with teaching our young people to think for themselves. To question everything. To follow no one without checking their gut first. We need to exemplify kindness, charity, forgiveness, compassion, acceptance of all and the exclusion of none.
Ninety-nine point nine percent of us do not take up weapons and kill. Why? Let's tap into that. Let's mass produce that.
Thursday, January 8, 2015
Paris Shootings - January 7, 2015
Twelve human beings were killed in Paris yesterday. They were killed for speaking their minds openly. In the aftermath, "Je suis Charlie" has become the rallying cry for journalists throughout the world: "I am Charlie".
Freedom of speech is the cornerstone of Democracy. When human beings are muzzled, tyranny takes over.
And yet, what is Freedom? Does it come with no responsibility, no consequences?
Be clear, no one deserves to be killed for one's words! No one deserves to be persecuted for one's words (or cartoons in this case)!
In turn, I believe that with every right comes a responsibility. I live in a world peopled by seven billion other human beings. I am not alone. What I say and do matters. Everyday, somewhere, a politician is called to task for something he or she said. He/she can continue to say the perceived offensive words, or he/she can desist. The consequences may well decide his/her political future. By calling these individuals to task no one has denied them the right to speak, but it has also made clear that with this right comes another one, equally sacred, that of rebuttal. Those who understand the complexity of our world will respond in such circumstances with integrity and courage. Others, a small minority of our world, will not. Paris is but one example of the deep, polarizing anger simmering in many parts of our world, angry individuals who need very little to set them on a course of utter destruction.
The questions begging for audience during this awful time are these: Do we continue to speak our minds without thought of what we are saying and how it is being portrayed, or do take pause to consider the outcome. Do our comments make the world better? Safer? More humane? Are we the only ones who may be put in harm's way by our actions?
"No man is an island. No man stands alone." As the song says.
There are many ways to stand up for human rights. For justice. For tolerance. To stand against poverty. Isolation. Hatred. Misunderstanding between cultures. Any of which could provoke a similar outcome. It is not that we should not speak our mind, it is that we should do so with the outcome in mind.
It is true that freedom of speech cannot be abridged in an open society, but Freedom is not the right to do anything we want any time we want. Each person with that right is tasked to use it responsibly.
We create the world in which we live. Within that world, each of us holds certain things dear. If nothing is sacred. If everything is open to assault, then are we really free? Should we really be targeting the Prophet, the Koran, Islam, Moslems? Is it not the radical and angry individual who causes wars, panic and death?
I absolutely condemn the actions of the gunmen in Paris! But this conversation cannot be one-sided.
Why does terrorism persist? What are its roots causes? Do we really believe that killing or maligning the problem, by whatever means, will make it go away?
There has to be more! There must be more!
Twelve human beings were killed in Paris yesterday. They were killed for speaking their minds openly. In the aftermath, "Je suis Charlie" has become the rallying cry for journalists throughout the world: "I am Charlie".
Freedom of speech is the cornerstone of Democracy. When human beings are muzzled, tyranny takes over.
And yet, what is Freedom? Does it come with no responsibility, no consequences?
Be clear, no one deserves to be killed for one's words! No one deserves to be persecuted for one's words (or cartoons in this case)!
In turn, I believe that with every right comes a responsibility. I live in a world peopled by seven billion other human beings. I am not alone. What I say and do matters. Everyday, somewhere, a politician is called to task for something he or she said. He/she can continue to say the perceived offensive words, or he/she can desist. The consequences may well decide his/her political future. By calling these individuals to task no one has denied them the right to speak, but it has also made clear that with this right comes another one, equally sacred, that of rebuttal. Those who understand the complexity of our world will respond in such circumstances with integrity and courage. Others, a small minority of our world, will not. Paris is but one example of the deep, polarizing anger simmering in many parts of our world, angry individuals who need very little to set them on a course of utter destruction.
The questions begging for audience during this awful time are these: Do we continue to speak our minds without thought of what we are saying and how it is being portrayed, or do take pause to consider the outcome. Do our comments make the world better? Safer? More humane? Are we the only ones who may be put in harm's way by our actions?
"No man is an island. No man stands alone." As the song says.
There are many ways to stand up for human rights. For justice. For tolerance. To stand against poverty. Isolation. Hatred. Misunderstanding between cultures. Any of which could provoke a similar outcome. It is not that we should not speak our mind, it is that we should do so with the outcome in mind.
It is true that freedom of speech cannot be abridged in an open society, but Freedom is not the right to do anything we want any time we want. Each person with that right is tasked to use it responsibly.
We create the world in which we live. Within that world, each of us holds certain things dear. If nothing is sacred. If everything is open to assault, then are we really free? Should we really be targeting the Prophet, the Koran, Islam, Moslems? Is it not the radical and angry individual who causes wars, panic and death?
I absolutely condemn the actions of the gunmen in Paris! But this conversation cannot be one-sided.
Why does terrorism persist? What are its roots causes? Do we really believe that killing or maligning the problem, by whatever means, will make it go away?
There has to be more! There must be more!
Friday, October 31, 2014
An open letter to Pope Francis
His Holiness, Pope
Francis, PP
00120 Via del
Pellegrino
Citta del Vaticano
Dear Pope Francis,
This letter is being
written in response to the recent Synod in Rome. I pray that you
receive it and that is does not fall into a discarded pile of correspondence in
some remote corner of the Vatican.
I don’t believe that
Jesus asked for permission to bring love and tolerance to the world. I do
not believe he waited until the Romans or the Pharisees caught up
with his teachings. I believe he took action, instead, and welcomed
all to his table. For this he was tortured and hung on a cross.
Jesus was an
activist—a fearless voice in the midst of staid minds and misguided
hearts. He stood against the Romans. He did not hesitate.
When is the Catholic
Church going to re-embrace the gospel of Jesus? “Love one another as
your Father in heaven loves you.”
If the Catholic Church
turned its energies and its frustrations toward poverty, inequality, war, greed
and disenfranchisement, instead of whether a loving couple is heterosexual or
gay, perhaps the world would change faster. Move faster toward the
light and away from the darkness.
The recent meeting of
Cardinals in Rome is admirable. It is a step forward. But
it is too little, too late, for those who want only to be loved as they are.
If not now,
when? If not you, Pope Francis, who?
Democratic process is
noble. Being an American, I understand it completely. But
the tortured process of majority rule too often tramples the minority who are
crying from the desert of their hearts to set us free.
A Church that denies
communion to divorced people; who chooses to love the sinner and despise the
sin, as if the two can be separated; and who sees birth control as an evil
tool, does not understand the world in which we live.
Jesus did not found a
church, he exemplified a lifestyle. He welcomed all, loved all,
forgave all, and cherished all. If he were here today, gay people,
transgender people, divorced people, struggling families, and those who make unwise
choices sexually would not be excluded, or even singled out.
We are all prodigal
sons and daughters. Judge not lest you be judged. One
cannot preach love with one breath and then layer that love with
caveats. Love is all or nothing.
The great masses of humanity
are waiting for a new voice. A new heart. A world that
embraces all, so that all can heal.
Can you be that
person? Can you take that step? Those who are not ready
for such courage will perhaps be left behind. Not all followed
Jesus. But those who did, lived, and died, not for him, but for his
heart. His courage. His willingness to lay it all on the
line. To Jesus, death was not too great a price to
pay. It was a short life. But, 2,000 years later
his teachings have not been forgotten, nor the depth of his love
forsaken. Sadly, many of the churches of this world have lost their
way.
I was baptized
Catholic. I no longer practice. I cannot be part of any
organization that says they follow Jesus and yet cast aside half of humanity
because they “judge” them to be unworthy of a place at the Table. Most
heartbreaking of all, you ask those of us on the outside looking in, to
wait. But you see, Holy Father, I cannot wait for acceptance one
second longer. Jesus has already accepted me, and he did it without
a church or a synod. He did it because it is the only way love
works.
In the end, perhaps Jesus did not found a church simply because he knew that, once your formalize love it dissolves in your hands.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)